Ann O'Nymous

EDIT I finally decided to sign, as the new date for the rules was yesterday. Maybe it was general. Time will tell... Whatever happens, I will keep it as a souvenir of paranoia... or not...

 At least, it is what I think I am accused of since I saw a screen with the following message when I tried to post yesterday in the evening: “Ann O'Nymous, You must accept the Forum Rules below to be able to use some forum functions.” [1]

In « Re: Tory Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaws. Yet Again », I said : « Maybe, just maybe, it is for the same reason MPB did not called the police on the 12th? » (Post 155[2], AnonMomAnon2), « Some ado about non-entities over here? » (Post 171[3], Skeptic1337), « Maybe, just maybe, Tory did not want to involve third parties and tried to solve it differently (not referring to TG)? » (Post 175[4], realitybites), « Not concerned here. maybe others... » (Post 183[5], megaphonebitch), « If you refer to the recent one, the situation changed slightly, if I am correct. », « Not concerned here. Maybe others... » and « I will continue to look at it and let you know if I come to different conclusions. » (Post 189[6], Skeptic1337), « I tend to agree. », « You are right, but I don't see what this adds to the understanding? », « What would the cops have been able to do? You are infering that Tory knew MPB's identity. Is that correct? », « Did I say something different? » and « For the record, I made the "threat" in mainstream to publish some of AMA2's posts in the TD. Haven't thought about it before, but it might be this that get me banned for 5 months. » (Post 202[7], AnonMomAnon2), « I do not have the whole chronology in mind (my mistake) and you may be right. » (Post 206[8], Skeptic1337).

So, from my side, nothing but polite remarks, questions and answers (the same cannot be said of many of the answers I received). One person acknowledged that, at least on one point (thank you) : « You might have a point there. The amount of shit stirring and why the dome is now a fucking vehicle for individual vandettas is fucking odd. I concede this. » (Post 185, by Skeptic1337[9]).

In « The LAST SELLECK Thread »[10], I wrote « Is it me or this thread was closed at about the same time as its mirror in the mainstream? IMHO, it would be fair to close it too. » (Post 137[11]), « Quote: Originally Posted by Daywatch. Dome is freefire zone. only CP and personal info get things closed.LURK MOAR NEWFAG. As a general statement, it is true. But weren't this thread and the "evidence" one closed? » (Post 142[12]), « Just stating what I think to be true or right. Prove me wrong. », « We already had this before, and you fell asleep. Remember? » and « This time I will not grace you with answers. » (Post 147[13], megaphonebitch), « Please read what the quote refers to before answering. It might help you look less stupid. », (Post 154[14], Ten Tigers).

In « Re: Highly Intellectual Debate on the Ethics of Mental Health », I wrote « Isn't it a rather nice way to lead the pack ? Choose a losse subject and a funny picture and let the others think about what you might think. Then surf on it. Having said that, do as you please... » (Post 42[15], Skeptic1337).